Enterprise Standards:Alignment & Unity Reference Content - Revision history

Admin at 18:32, 28 October 2015

2015-10-28T18:32:02Z

90.185.212.37 at 12:42, 3 September 2015

2015-09-03T12:42:35Z

90.185.212.37 at 12:42, 3 September 2015

2015-09-03T12:42:14Z

Admin at 11:39, 3 September 2015

2015-09-03T11:39:09Z

87.121.100.91: Created page with "Category:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards"

2015-07-13T09:11:42Z

Created page with "Category:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards"

New page

[[Category:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards]]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Based on these high level alignment inhibitors that were identified, LEADing Practice has developed an Alignment Management framework to solve these issues across organizational levels.
-The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and templates that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and templates of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:
+The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and artefacts that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and artefacts of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:
 {|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
 |class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
-'''Standard/Template'''
+'''Standard/Artefact'''
 |class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
 '''Reference Content'''

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 [[File:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Unity-Model-01.png|thumb|800px|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]
-Solving the Alignment Management Challenges
+'''Solving the Alignment Management Challenges'''
 Most stakeholders across the enterprise landscape have some of the same external and internal forces and drivers influencing them, but they have different approaches. These stakeholders don’t see what is common, and therefore don’t know how (or why) to work together. This indicates a lack of alignment maturity and results in enterprise strategy, management and operations that are disjointed, and does not provide the expected return on investment. The top twelve inhibitors to achieve alignment of effort as identified by stakeholders are:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{DISPLAYTITLE: Alignment & Unity Reference Content}}
 The Alignment & Unity reference content provides the practitioner with a holistic:
 #'''Way of Thinking (Stage 1):''' Development of a common understanding, so that a common point of view can be built that enables the organization with a way to compare and contrast. The way of thinking should be used by stakeholders involved in all planning activities around alignment and unification.
 #'''Way of Working (Stage 2):''' Development of a common way of describing the alignment of objects that have been identified in the way of thinking. The way of working should be used by individuals or teams involved in describing the common objects and the detailed requirements.
 #'''Way of Alignment Modeling (Stage 3):''' Development of a common way of modeling and designing which takes the previously identified common objects and detailed requirements and translates them into aligned sets of  deliverables that can be used to execute business transformation and innovation through portfolios, programs and projects.
 [[File:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Unity-Model-01.png|thumb|800px|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]
@@ Line 30: / Line 27: @@
 The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and templates that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and templates of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:
 {|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" |
 |class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" |
@@ Line 79: / Line 77: @@
 |-
 |}
 '''Background of the Alignment & Unity Reference Content'''
 The Alignment & Unity concept was developed for the US Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the aim to:
 *Unify common stakeholders, objectives and size the common mission-critical aspects across complex missions and multi-dimensional warfare such as cyberwar, the combating of weapons of mass destruction, combating translation organization crime and security corporations.
 *Achieve information sharing, unity of effort to meet national security, US Department of Defense  with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State.
@@ Line 92: / Line 90: @@
 While the Alignment & Unity reference content is jointly owned by the US Government and the LEADing Practice community, it can be freely used by anybody who has received adequate training in how to use it. The contact persons are:
 *Developers and practitioners: Mr. Ken Teske and Mike Tisdel, US Government contractors.
 *Alignment & Unity reference content architect: Professor Mark von Rosing, Global University Alliance.
@@ Line 101: / Line 98: @@
 The TBS and CBSA branches of the Government of Canada recently transformed and optimized their organizations through using the Alignment & Unity reference content. An entirely customized version of the reference content was created as a pyramid for this particular project. The pyramid beautifully summarizes the alignment and unification intentions and initiatives of both organizations.
+[[File:Henrik-with-Pyramid.png|thumb|900px|The Alignment & Unity Pyramid presented by Henrik von Scheel, CEO at LEADing Practice.]]
-[[File:Henrik-with-Pyramid.png|thumb|800px|The Alignment & Unity Pyramid presented by Henrik von Scheel, CEO at LEADing Practice.]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 3 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards]]		[[Category:Enterprise Transformation & Innovation Standards]]
		+	{{DISPLAYTITLE: Alignment & Unity Reference Content}}
		+
		+	The Alignment & Unity reference content provides the practitioner with a holistic:
		+
		+	#'''Way of Thinking (Stage 1):''' Development of a common understanding, so that a common point of view can be built that enables the organization with a way to compare and contrast. The way of thinking should be used by stakeholders involved in all planning activities around alignment and unification.
		+	#'''Way of Working (Stage 2):''' Development of a common way of describing the alignment of objects that have been identified in the way of thinking. The way of working should be used by individuals or teams involved in describing the common objects and the detailed requirements.
		+	#'''Way of Alignment Modeling (Stage 3):''' Development of a common way of modeling and designing which takes the previously identified common objects and detailed requirements and translates them into aligned sets of deliverables that can be used to execute business transformation and innovation through portfolios, programs and projects.
		+
		+
		+	[[File:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Unity-Model-01.png\|thumb\|800px\|Service-Oriented Architecture Reference Content Poster]]
		+
		+	Solving the Alignment Management Challenges
		+
		+	Most stakeholders across the enterprise landscape have some of the same external and internal forces and drivers influencing them, but they have different approaches. These stakeholders don’t see what is common, and therefore don’t know how (or why) to work together. This indicates a lack of alignment maturity and results in enterprise strategy, management and operations that are disjointed, and does not provide the expected return on investment. The top twelve inhibitors to achieve alignment of effort as identified by stakeholders are:
		+	#Stove pipes/silos (lack of information sharing)
		+	#No visibility of efforts and activities
		+	#Duplication of efforts and investments
		+	#Lack of planning resources
		+	#No established process (ad hoc)
		+	#No collective repository of information
		+	#No forcing function to drive alignment effort
		+	#Conflicts in planning timelines
		+	#Random acts of goodness (uncoordinated)
		+	#Competing priorities
		+	#Differing lexicon/taxonomy/language/vocabulary/semantics
		+	#Disparate activities
		+
		+	Based on these high level alignment inhibitors that were identified, LEADing Practice has developed an Alignment Management framework to solve these issues across organizational levels.
		+
		+	The LEADing Practice Alignment & Unity reference content has the purpose to identify, develop and tailor Alignment & Unity-specific standards and templates that are applied in specific and ongoing projects. Some of the standards and templates of the reference content (including reference content that was used during the 3 stages of the Alignment & Unity Model above) are:
		+	{\|class="wikitable" style="width:100%" \|
		+	\|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 70%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" \|
		+	'''Standard/Template'''
		+	\|class="thead" style="background-color:rgb(195, 217, 255);width: 30%;text-align:left;padding-left:1%;padding-top:1%;" \|
		+	'''Reference Content'''
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[#\|Strategic Alignment Map]]
		+	\|Competency
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[F\|Tactical Alignment Map]]
		+	\|Competency
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[#\|Operational Alignment Map]]
		+	\|Competency
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-1-Way-of-Thinking-01.png\|Alignment Management Stage 1]]
		+	\|Requirements
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-2-Way-of-Working-01.png\|Alignment Management Stage 2]]
		+	\|Requirements
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Management-Stage-3-Way-of-Modeling-01.png]]
		+	\|Requirements
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[#\|Stakeholder Expectations Alignment]]
		+	\|Value
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[#\|Stakeholder Objective Alignment]]
		+	\|Value
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Stages-of-the-Alignment-Management-Framework-01.png\|Stages of the Alignment Management Framework]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Quick-Scan-01.png\|Alignment Maturity Quick Scan]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-Benchmark-01.png\|Alignment Maturity Benchmark]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Maturity-TCO-ROI-Evaluation-01.png\|Alignment Maturity TCO-ROI Evaluation]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Spider-web-Maturity-Assessment-01.png\|Spider-web Maturity Assessment]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Media:Alignment-Unity-Reference-Content-Alignment-Development-Path-01.png\|Alignment Development Path]]
		+	\|Maturity
		+	\|-
		+	\|}
		+
		+	'''Background of the Alignment & Unity Reference Content'''
		+
		+	The Alignment & Unity concept was developed for the US Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the aim to:
		+
		+	*Unify common stakeholders, objectives and size the common mission-critical aspects across complex missions and multi-dimensional warfare such as cyberwar, the combating of weapons of mass destruction, combating translation organization crime and security corporations.
		+	*Achieve information sharing, unity of effort to meet national security, US Department of Defense with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State.
		+
		+	<blockquote>
		+	''After reviewing over 350 projects in both private and public organizations, the board of Global University Alliance, consisting of over 300 universities and the executive board of LEADing Practice community, consisting of over 3100 certified practitioners have unanimously decided to award the US Government and specifically the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Department of State with the [[#\|“The Frontier Runner of the Year”]] award in recognition of their innovation and development of a Unification Framework.''
		+	</blockquote>
		+
		+	While the Alignment & Unity reference content is jointly owned by the US Government and the LEADing Practice community, it can be freely used by anybody who has received adequate training in how to use it. The contact persons are:
		+
		+	*Developers and practitioners: Mr. Ken Teske and Mike Tisdel, US Government contractors.
		+	*Alignment & Unity reference content architect: Professor Mark von Rosing, Global University Alliance.
		+	*Alignment & Unity reference content coordinator: Henrik von Scheel, LEADing Practice, CEO.
		+
		+	'''Government of Canada TBS (Treasury Board Secretariat) and CBSA (Canadian Border Services Agency)'''
		+
		+	The TBS and CBSA branches of the Government of Canada recently transformed and optimized their organizations through using the Alignment & Unity reference content. An entirely customized version of the reference content was created as a pyramid for this particular project. The pyramid beautifully summarizes the alignment and unification intentions and initiatives of both organizations.
		+
		+
		+	[[File:Henrik-with-Pyramid.png\|thumb\|800px\|The Alignment & Unity Pyramid presented by Henrik von Scheel, CEO at LEADing Practice.]]